top of page

Existential cold

Arseniy PETROV

In 2021, Pavel Otdelnov presented the painting "Time", where he depicted a familiar clock from childhood on a blue background - the intro of the main Soviet news TV show. The hand froze a second from the start, forcing the viewer to languish and stretching out the "time" to comprehend what is happening. For generations who remember the socialist reality, the painting clearly conveys a feeling of returning to the past or that it, as it sometimes seems, never went away.

 

Reflection on historical time as a moment that unites the actions of society and the individual has been common for thinking people in recent years. While the authorities were intensifying the construction of ideology around history and painting a picture of the future as a return to the great past, books on the societies of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were published and read in Russia, anticipating, but far from fully, the vector of change and trying to comprehend the properties of the coming reality.

 

On February 24, the clock hand seemed to break loose, it rushed backwards, at a furious pace, flashing before us the traumas of social and family memory, showing how alive in us are the terrible blows of history. The first mixed feelings, naturally, outpaced deep reflection - pain for the Ukrainians; a sense of shame for the state; "as if I were in a concentration camp, simultaneously a fascist and a Jew"; a sense of a stolen life and future, when personal efforts to create and integrate into a European and humanistic society were destroyed; "as if the country had been smashed against the wall."

 

It would be a mistake to reduce the entire experience of experiences to a single pattern, just as it would be a mistake to reduce the entire artistic response in Russian art to the historical tragedy of 2022 to a single theme. One side of the terrible-common consists of the experience of one's absolute loneliness: in front of the Leviathan, crushing any significant protest and devouring potential leaders of political protest; in front of those who reproach one for belonging to the attacking state or to its culture; in front of the historical process, which breaks everything around with a storm, leaving you with the most insignificant space for action. This new experience turns out to be in some way a repetition of the previous one. It is as if we have returned to the words of Brodsky: “Over the course of this century, the Russian people have suffered something that no other people (well, maybe the Chinese got more) have suffered. [...] We saw the absolutely naked, literally naked basis of life. We were stripped and taken off our shoes, and put out into the colossal existential cold.”

After the war had already begun, Pavel Otdelnov created a series where he broke the war down into snow-covered elements. These included a burnt-out typical Mariupol house, a dictator, and a TV with the timeless "Swan Lake". The main thing is the naked and disunited people of an entire "Generation", exposed to the cold and freezing chest-deep in snowdrifts, as well as the word "Future", covered in snow. The lifeless frozen steppes here go beyond the banal associations with Russia. The destroyed house has lost its residents; many people who inhabited the "invading country" have lost their life supports, connections, a future, the value of which is fully felt in the loss. The grayness of Otdelnov's landscapes covering everything gives the images a look of ordinariness and at the same time historical timelessness. The weather's hopelessness has passed into the dimension of historical hopelessness.

In recent exhibitions Andrey Kuzkin’s little figures moulded out of bread have appeared in the context of the group installation “Bedesmen and Heroes”. In 2022 they are being made in the same small format, but individually. In “In the Ruins”, made of broken tiles and cement found by chance, these figures are the highest expression of sorrow and pain. When he began to work with bread as a material, Kuzkin evoked the tradition of modelling in bread in Russian prisons, and eucharistic associations. It is hard to say whether this symbolism plays a part in his most recent work. Bread undoubtedly makes the rough finish convincing, and the generalised nature of the ruins allows a breadth of possible interpretations: as the victims of bombing, or as the wrecked lives of refugees and emigrants. The bareness, the lack of any covering for these modest – and for that very reason very trustworthy – figures allows an immediate experience of the misfortune that has befallen them. The series ends with “Eternal Spring in Solitary Confinement” with an absolutely minimalist mise en scène. Kuzkin’s man does not appear to have been driven into a corner, he calmly occupies his space. His surroundings do not look much like prison walls, on the contrary, they are softened by natural elements: the bare twigs of a bush, a bird, and something that might be either the sun or the moon (a ping-pong ball coloured a warm yellow). The prison walls shut him off from society, separate him from the milieu of family or friends, and Kuzkin’s “solitary confinement” is indeed close to Brodsky’s existential abandonment.

His words about existential cold end as follows: “The result of this must be enormous human suffering.” Today’s propaganda pushes the heroicisation of the “Great Victory” and its participants. As a counterbalance to this, Russian art has always lacked an interpretation of all the fallen, and all of the participants in war as victims, including the “victims of history”, as Brodsky called those who had mindlessly succumbed to propaganda in his Nobel acceptance speech. It is doubtful whether the present military aggressors may be pitied, and that certainly cannot be expected of people who live in Ukraine, but at the same time, art allows one to test one’s feelings. Thus Sergei Prokofiev has created a series of dead “invaders”. These figures show different phases of the history of a corpse, which has lost its human component and is going through an exclusively natural cycle.

A stiffened body. A dog eating a soldier. A decomposed body. Something growing out of another body. Yet another body, no longer on the surface of the earth, we can only see its outline in the growing wheat if we look from above. Sergei Prokofiev’s technique – a 3D pen and black plastic – looks particularly effective when he photographs his work against a snow-white background. All these figures of soldiers – burnt, rotting, eaten by dogs and pigs, could be seen in documentary shots of 2022. We are trying to erase them from our memories; looking at this for any length of time is unbearable.

Prokofiev’s images, though equally true to life, allow us to rest our gaze on them, they relieve the acuity of the moment. Translated into plastic, swallowed by the shining white background, they are perceived, as it were, from the distance of history. The dead man, even if he is an invader, is a human life stupidly destroyed, a failure of humanity. When the fanfares and propaganda speeches have faded away, there will just be bodies lying in the fields, and they will become fertiliser.

The sunflower growing out of a soldier’s body is an immediate echo by Prokofiev of one of the main images of Anselm Kiefer. Born in 1945, he has spent all his life interpreting the German cultural tragedy of the twentieth century, on questions of history and war as a man-made catastrophe. At his exhibition in Venice in 2022, a coffin with two sunflowers inside it was placed at the centre of the key composition. It may be noticed that this is not only two modern artists echoing each other. Van Gogh’s sunflowers, which opened the way to expressionism in European painting, are full of vitality, life and hope. Kiefer’s, and his Russian contemporary’s, look like a dried-up resinous sun, and there is no longer any hope that their seeds will be good for anything.

 

Like they year 2022 itself, the chosen works do not leave the viewer any cause for optimism.  But it is important that there are artists who raise these topics.  This may be a means of reassembling Russian culture, and of overcoming the existential cold.

Written with the support of Scholars at Risk – Italy

(Università di Trento, coord. Ester Gallo)

First published: 08.02.2023, Arterritory.com

CONTACTS

CSAR - Centre for Studies in Russian, Central Asia, and the Caucasus Art
Dipartimento di Filosofia e Beni Culturali
Malcanton Marcorà, Dorsoduro 3484/D, 30123 Venezia

mappingdiaspora@unive.it
tel.: +39 041 234 6223

© 2023 MAPPING DIASPORA

© designed by A. Stravinsky

bottom of page